<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (10) TMI 130 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81561</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was admissible on duty-paid Crown Corks rendered unfit during bottling, because Rule 57D(1) does not deny credit merely when part of the input ends up as waste, refuse or by-product in manufacture. The damaged corks were treated as waste arising in the course of production, and the fact that the entire cork was not incorporated into the final product did not defeat credit. The Revenue&#039;s objection therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:07:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118706" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (10) TMI 130 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81561</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was admissible on duty-paid Crown Corks rendered unfit during bottling, because Rule 57D(1) does not deny credit merely when part of the input ends up as waste, refuse or by-product in manufacture. The damaged corks were treated as waste arising in the course of production, and the fact that the entire cork was not incorporated into the final product did not defeat credit. The Revenue&#039;s objection therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>