<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 284 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81517</link>
    <description>A show cause notice invoking the extended limitation period was invalid because it was issued by an officer not legally empowered to do so under the Central Excises &amp; Salt Act, 1944. The objection was treated as a pure question of law going to the root of the matter and was allowed to be raised without fresh evidence. Proceedings founded on a notice issued by an incompetent authority could not be sustained, and the order under appeal was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:24:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 284 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81517</link>
      <description>A show cause notice invoking the extended limitation period was invalid because it was issued by an officer not legally empowered to do so under the Central Excises &amp; Salt Act, 1944. The objection was treated as a pure question of law going to the root of the matter and was allowed to be raised without fresh evidence. Proceedings founded on a notice issued by an incompetent authority could not be sustained, and the order under appeal was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>