https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81511 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution, leading to an application for recalling the order by the Tribunal. The appellant cited delays in submitting necessary papers due to reorganization as sufficient cause for non-prosecution. The respondent did not object to the restoration of the appeal, leaving the decision to the Tribunal's discretion. After reviewing the case and considering procedural compliance, the Tribunal restored the appeal to its original number, emphasizing the importance of compliance with orders and the balance between procedural rules and the right to be heard. The Tribunal exercised its inherent powers to ensure justice was served without disproportionate penalties for procedural lapses. en-us Tue, 26 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:02:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81511 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution, leading to an application for recalling the order by the Tribunal. The appellant cited delays in submitting necessary papers due to reorganization as sufficient cause for non-prosecution. The respondent did not object to the restoration of the appeal, leaving the decision to the Tribunal's discretion. After reviewing the case and considering procedural compliance, the Tribunal restored the appeal to its original number, emphasizing the importance of compliance with orders and the balance between procedural rules and the right to be heard. The Tribunal exercised its inherent powers to ensure justice was served without disproportionate penalties for procedural lapses. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 26 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81511