<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (10) TMI 124 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81507</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay interpreted the term &quot;specified brand name&quot; in circulars by the Spices Export Promotion Council regarding cash compensatory support (CCS) rates for spice exporters. The court ruled that exporters could specify their own brand names, entitling them to the higher CCS rate, as there was no designated authority for specifying brand names at the time of the circulars. The court upheld an interim order directing the respondents to provide CCS at 10% to the petitioners, dismissing the appeal and clarifying the interpretation of &quot;specified brand name&quot; without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:42:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (10) TMI 124 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81507</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay interpreted the term &quot;specified brand name&quot; in circulars by the Spices Export Promotion Council regarding cash compensatory support (CCS) rates for spice exporters. The court ruled that exporters could specify their own brand names, entitling them to the higher CCS rate, as there was no designated authority for specifying brand names at the time of the circulars. The court upheld an interim order directing the respondents to provide CCS at 10% to the petitioners, dismissing the appeal and clarifying the interpretation of &quot;specified brand name&quot; without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>