https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81495 A challenge to prosecution for alleged non-conformity of a sample failed at the threshold because the complaint and analyst's report prima facie indicated deviation from the label standard, and the correctness of the analytical method required evidence rather than inherent-jurisdiction review. On vicarious criminal liability, the complaint had to contain a foundational averment that the persons sought to be prosecuted were, at the relevant time, in charge of and responsible for the company's business. As no such allegation was made against two directors, proceedings were quashed against them, while the prosecution continued against the company and the remaining officers. en-us Mon, 19 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:11:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81495 A challenge to prosecution for alleged non-conformity of a sample failed at the threshold because the complaint and analyst's report prima facie indicated deviation from the label standard, and the correctness of the analytical method required evidence rather than inherent-jurisdiction review. On vicarious criminal liability, the complaint had to contain a foundational averment that the persons sought to be prosecuted were, at the relevant time, in charge of and responsible for the company's business. As no such allegation was made against two directors, proceedings were quashed against them, while the prosecution continued against the company and the remaining officers. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81495