<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (8) TMI 194 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81494</link>
    <description>Small-scale exemption under Notification No. 175/86 depended on either registration as an SSI unit or coverage under the proviso for manufacturers who had actually availed the earlier exemption scheme in the preceding financial year. A certificate for a different unit could not by itself establish eligibility for the unit in question, but that did not defeat exemption where the record showed prior availment of the relevant exemption and clearances remained within the prescribed limits. Filing declarations under licensing-control notifications was held not to be the test for &quot;availing of the exemption&quot; under the notification. The exemption claim therefore succeeded on the basis of prior actual exemption availment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:10:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (8) TMI 194 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81494</link>
      <description>Small-scale exemption under Notification No. 175/86 depended on either registration as an SSI unit or coverage under the proviso for manufacturers who had actually availed the earlier exemption scheme in the preceding financial year. A certificate for a different unit could not by itself establish eligibility for the unit in question, but that did not defeat exemption where the record showed prior availment of the relevant exemption and clearances remained within the prescribed limits. Filing declarations under licensing-control notifications was held not to be the test for &quot;availing of the exemption&quot; under the notification. The exemption claim therefore succeeded on the basis of prior actual exemption availment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>