<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (8) TMI 193 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81493</link>
    <description>Cottonseed oil extracted by the expeller method falls within the statutory definition of &quot;vegetable oil&quot; for cess under the Vegetable Oils Cess Act, 1983, because oil produced from oilseeds or other plant-origin oil-bearing material is covered unless it has undergone further processing after recovery. The attempted distinction between oil &quot;produced&quot; and oil &quot;recovered&quot; was rejected, and the captive-consumption exemption under Rule 9 was found inapplicable on the facts. A limitation objection raised for the first time before the Tribunal, without findings by the lower authorities, required factual examination at the adjudication stage and was remanded for fresh decision after hearing the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:04:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (8) TMI 193 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81493</link>
      <description>Cottonseed oil extracted by the expeller method falls within the statutory definition of &quot;vegetable oil&quot; for cess under the Vegetable Oils Cess Act, 1983, because oil produced from oilseeds or other plant-origin oil-bearing material is covered unless it has undergone further processing after recovery. The attempted distinction between oil &quot;produced&quot; and oil &quot;recovered&quot; was rejected, and the captive-consumption exemption under Rule 9 was found inapplicable on the facts. A limitation objection raised for the first time before the Tribunal, without findings by the lower authorities, required factual examination at the adjudication stage and was remanded for fresh decision after hearing the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>