<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (8) TMI 191 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81491</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the refund was admissible under Section 23(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, as the loss occurred before the amendment. The decision highlighted the significance of the survey report and differentiated between Sections 13 and 23 concerning pilferage and loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:00:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (8) TMI 191 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81491</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the refund was admissible under Section 23(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, as the loss occurred before the amendment. The decision highlighted the significance of the survey report and differentiated between Sections 13 and 23 concerning pilferage and loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>