<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (9) TMI 177 - BEFORE THE COLLECTOR (APPEALS), TIRUCHIRAPALLI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81487</link>
    <description>The judgment determined that partnership firms with common partners should be treated as separate legal entities for the purpose of eligibility under Notification No. 175/86. Emphasizing the distinct legal status of partnership firms, the court held that common partners alone do not justify treating them as a single manufacturer to prevent tax evasion. The firms, having individual licenses and financial independence, were considered independent entities entitled to the notification&#039;s benefits. Consequently, the denial of exemption under the notification to both firms was deemed incorrect, leading to the allowance of the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 15:29:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (9) TMI 177 - BEFORE THE COLLECTOR (APPEALS), TIRUCHIRAPALLI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81487</link>
      <description>The judgment determined that partnership firms with common partners should be treated as separate legal entities for the purpose of eligibility under Notification No. 175/86. Emphasizing the distinct legal status of partnership firms, the court held that common partners alone do not justify treating them as a single manufacturer to prevent tax evasion. The firms, having individual licenses and financial independence, were considered independent entities entitled to the notification&#039;s benefits. Consequently, the denial of exemption under the notification to both firms was deemed incorrect, leading to the allowance of the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>