<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (6) TMI 153 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81481</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving misdeclaration of the country of origin and under-valuation of imported goods. The Tribunal accepted the appellants&#039; explanation for the misdeclaration, finding it to be a corrected mistake. Regarding the under-valuation issue, the Tribunal sided with the appellants, highlighting discrepancies in the Collector&#039;s evidence and emphasizing the importance of transaction value over the application of Rule 5 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988. The Tribunal set aside the Collector&#039;s order, concluding that the assessable value should not have been enhanced based on Rule 5.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 14:59:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (6) TMI 153 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81481</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving misdeclaration of the country of origin and under-valuation of imported goods. The Tribunal accepted the appellants&#039; explanation for the misdeclaration, finding it to be a corrected mistake. Regarding the under-valuation issue, the Tribunal sided with the appellants, highlighting discrepancies in the Collector&#039;s evidence and emphasizing the importance of transaction value over the application of Rule 5 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988. The Tribunal set aside the Collector&#039;s order, concluding that the assessable value should not have been enhanced based on Rule 5.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>