<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 179 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81477</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed as the Adjudicating Authority failed to establish a contravention of Section 11K of the Customs Act, 1962, regarding the confiscation of silver slabs. The lack of evidence supporting the transportation from Dumariaganj region led to the conclusion that the confiscation under Section 113(1) of the Customs Act was unsustainable. The appellant&#039;s explanation that the silver slabs were for ornament manufacturing was accepted, and consequential relief was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 14:48:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 179 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81477</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed as the Adjudicating Authority failed to establish a contravention of Section 11K of the Customs Act, 1962, regarding the confiscation of silver slabs. The lack of evidence supporting the transportation from Dumariaganj region led to the conclusion that the confiscation under Section 113(1) of the Customs Act was unsustainable. The appellant&#039;s explanation that the silver slabs were for ornament manufacturing was accepted, and consequential relief was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>