<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (10) TMI 122 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81466</link>
    <description>Warehousing permission does not finally determine whether an import licence validly covers the goods. Permission to deposit goods in bond concerns warehousing compliance, while licence validity may be examined before clearance for home consumption; adjudication may therefore proceed after warehousing and is not confined to review proceedings. Where imported goods are generally prohibited and an importer relies on an exception for lining or inter-lining material, the importer must produce satisfactory evidence of the goods&#039; nature, intended end-use and conformity with the permitted specification. Inadequate examination of those facts requires fresh adjudication on licence coverage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 13:23:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (10) TMI 122 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81466</link>
      <description>Warehousing permission does not finally determine whether an import licence validly covers the goods. Permission to deposit goods in bond concerns warehousing compliance, while licence validity may be examined before clearance for home consumption; adjudication may therefore proceed after warehousing and is not confined to review proceedings. Where imported goods are generally prohibited and an importer relies on an exception for lining or inter-lining material, the importer must produce satisfactory evidence of the goods&#039; nature, intended end-use and conformity with the permitted specification. Inadequate examination of those facts requires fresh adjudication on licence coverage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>