<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (8) TMI 287 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81461</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order and restoring the decision of the appellate authority. The court found in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the uniformity of discounts offered and rejecting the retrospective application of the post-1975 amendment to pre-existing transactions. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:46:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (8) TMI 287 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81461</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order and restoring the decision of the appellate authority. The court found in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the uniformity of discounts offered and rejecting the retrospective application of the post-1975 amendment to pre-existing transactions. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>