<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (9) TMI 167 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81443</link>
    <description>In construing an exemption notification, the expression &quot;tin foil&quot; was read in trade and common parlance rather than with a technical metallurgical approach. Foil with tin as the predominant constituent, but containing minor admixtures of lead and antimony, remained within the notification because it was understood in the relevant trade by the name of its principal metal and was used in capacitor manufacture. The later notification referring expressly to tin alloy foil was treated as confirming the practical width of the earlier entry. The denial of concessional customs duty and refund was therefore unsustainable, and the imported foil was held covered by the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:24:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (9) TMI 167 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81443</link>
      <description>In construing an exemption notification, the expression &quot;tin foil&quot; was read in trade and common parlance rather than with a technical metallurgical approach. Foil with tin as the predominant constituent, but containing minor admixtures of lead and antimony, remained within the notification because it was understood in the relevant trade by the name of its principal metal and was used in capacitor manufacture. The later notification referring expressly to tin alloy foil was treated as confirming the practical width of the earlier entry. The denial of concessional customs duty and refund was therefore unsustainable, and the imported foil was held covered by the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>