<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (8) TMI 177 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81432</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for rectification of mistake under Section 129B(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, as it found no mistake apparent on the face of the record in its order. The Tribunal clarified that rectification power does not allow for a review of the order already passed. It emphasized that the value of imported goods must comply with Section 14 of the Customs Act, and after considering all relevant aspects, no mistake was evident in the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:50:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (8) TMI 177 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81432</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for rectification of mistake under Section 129B(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, as it found no mistake apparent on the face of the record in its order. The Tribunal clarified that rectification power does not allow for a review of the order already passed. It emphasized that the value of imported goods must comply with Section 14 of the Customs Act, and after considering all relevant aspects, no mistake was evident in the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>