<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 190 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81423</link>
    <description>For valuation under section 4, related-person status requires mutuality of interest between buyer and seller and cannot be inferred merely from common directors or a one-way commercial relationship. On the facts stated, the buyer company was not a related person of the assessee. On limitation, disclosure of the price list and the buyer&#039;s status in returns, together with departmental awareness of the exemption framework, meant suppression of facts was not established; the extended limitation period was therefore unavailable. The duty demand did not survive, with relief following on both the valuation and limitation issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:31:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 190 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81423</link>
      <description>For valuation under section 4, related-person status requires mutuality of interest between buyer and seller and cannot be inferred merely from common directors or a one-way commercial relationship. On the facts stated, the buyer company was not a related person of the assessee. On limitation, disclosure of the price list and the buyer&#039;s status in returns, together with departmental awareness of the exemption framework, meant suppression of facts was not established; the extended limitation period was therefore unavailable. The duty demand did not survive, with relief following on both the valuation and limitation issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>