<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 176 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81409</link>
    <description>Where the Supreme Court had already dismissed the Department&#039;s special leave petitions on merits against the same Tribunal order, the connected reference applications were no longer maintainable. The controversy had attained finality at the highest judicial level, leaving no surviving issue for consideration in the reference proceedings. The reference applications were therefore liable to be dismissed as unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:53:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 176 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81409</link>
      <description>Where the Supreme Court had already dismissed the Department&#039;s special leave petitions on merits against the same Tribunal order, the connected reference applications were no longer maintainable. The controversy had attained finality at the highest judicial level, leaving no surviving issue for consideration in the reference proceedings. The reference applications were therefore liable to be dismissed as unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>