<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (6) TMI 149 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81403</link>
    <description>In central excise, goods manufactured by an independent licensed unit cannot be treated as clearances of the raw-material supplier merely because the raw materials were supplied by that supplier. The actual manufacturer is the person who carries out the manufacturing activity, and clubbing is possible only if the alleged beneficiary is shown to have itself undertaken manufacture under its own supervision and control, such as by hiring the premises and equipment. As no evidence showed that the assessee controlled the outside unit&#039;s operations, the unit&#039;s clearances could not be added to the assessee&#039;s own clearances for Notification No. 85/85, and the exemption limit remained available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:04:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (6) TMI 149 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81403</link>
      <description>In central excise, goods manufactured by an independent licensed unit cannot be treated as clearances of the raw-material supplier merely because the raw materials were supplied by that supplier. The actual manufacturer is the person who carries out the manufacturing activity, and clubbing is possible only if the alleged beneficiary is shown to have itself undertaken manufacture under its own supervision and control, such as by hiring the premises and equipment. As no evidence showed that the assessee controlled the outside unit&#039;s operations, the unit&#039;s clearances could not be added to the assessee&#039;s own clearances for Notification No. 85/85, and the exemption limit remained available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>