<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (6) TMI 129 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81383</link>
    <description>Refund of duty on returned goods is available only when the statutory conditions are satisfied, including that the goods can be reconditioned or reprocessed and re-enter the market. Goods admitted to be junk and incapable of marketing after reprocessing do not meet that requirement, so refund under the returned-goods provisions is not admissible. An alternative refund claim based on the original clearance being non-dutiable cannot revive a time-barred refund demand where the original claim was made on a different basis and the new ground is inconsistent with it. The document therefore highlights the combined effect of statutory eligibility and refund limitation rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:30:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (6) TMI 129 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81383</link>
      <description>Refund of duty on returned goods is available only when the statutory conditions are satisfied, including that the goods can be reconditioned or reprocessed and re-enter the market. Goods admitted to be junk and incapable of marketing after reprocessing do not meet that requirement, so refund under the returned-goods provisions is not admissible. An alternative refund claim based on the original clearance being non-dutiable cannot revive a time-barred refund demand where the original claim was made on a different basis and the new ground is inconsistent with it. The document therefore highlights the combined effect of statutory eligibility and refund limitation rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>