<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 170 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81372</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the imported dies were classifiable under Heading 84.59(2) as parts of plastic extruders for the manufacture of plastic tapes and could not be deemed as interchangeable tools for machine tools. The appeal was allowed, and the order appealed against was set aside with consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:45:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 170 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81372</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the imported dies were classifiable under Heading 84.59(2) as parts of plastic extruders for the manufacture of plastic tapes and could not be deemed as interchangeable tools for machine tools. The appeal was allowed, and the order appealed against was set aside with consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>