<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 261 - CEGAT , BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81369</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order imposing a personal penalty on the appellants for their alleged involvement in an illicit transaction. The decision was based on the lack of proper investigation into the appellants&#039; identity, highlighting the absence of conclusive proof linking them to the illicit activity. The Tribunal found that the authorities failed to adequately verify the appellants&#039; connection to the incident, emphasizing the flaw in relying solely on name similarity without substantial evidence. As a result, the order was deemed unsustainable, granting the appellants consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:31:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 261 - CEGAT , BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81369</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order imposing a personal penalty on the appellants for their alleged involvement in an illicit transaction. The decision was based on the lack of proper investigation into the appellants&#039; identity, highlighting the absence of conclusive proof linking them to the illicit activity. The Tribunal found that the authorities failed to adequately verify the appellants&#039; connection to the incident, emphasizing the flaw in relying solely on name similarity without substantial evidence. As a result, the order was deemed unsustainable, granting the appellants consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>