<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 278 - BEFORE THE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81366</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Assistant Collector&#039;s order that rejected the refund claim for Brake Drums supplied to Ashok Leyland. The appellant successfully argued that a refund is allowed if goods are remanufactured, based on a previous Tribunal decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:20:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 278 - BEFORE THE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81366</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Assistant Collector&#039;s order that rejected the refund claim for Brake Drums supplied to Ashok Leyland. The appellant successfully argued that a refund is allowed if goods are remanufactured, based on a previous Tribunal decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>