<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 172 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81354</link>
    <description>Clause 8-B of the Imports (Control) Order, 1955 permits the competent authority to keep the grant of import licences or allotment of imported goods in abeyance in public interest without assigning reasons, once statutory satisfaction is reached on the basis of material before it. On prima facie findings of misrepresentation and diversion of imported goods in breach of licence conditions and the import policy, the Bombay High Court held that the petitioners&#039; assertions of bona fides did not displace that satisfaction. The Court declined to exercise writ discretion under Article 226, finding no arbitrariness or lack of supporting material to justify interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 172 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81354</link>
      <description>Clause 8-B of the Imports (Control) Order, 1955 permits the competent authority to keep the grant of import licences or allotment of imported goods in abeyance in public interest without assigning reasons, once statutory satisfaction is reached on the basis of material before it. On prima facie findings of misrepresentation and diversion of imported goods in breach of licence conditions and the import policy, the Bombay High Court held that the petitioners&#039; assertions of bona fides did not displace that satisfaction. The Court declined to exercise writ discretion under Article 226, finding no arbitrariness or lack of supporting material to justify interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>