https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81353 Alterations to a prescribed standard contract were held to violate Clause 33 where they went beyond mutually agreed and countersigned changes and materially altered substantive terms in the appellants' favour. The Court found the reprinted form could mislead contracting parties into treating it as the prescribed standard form, and treated the extensive amendments as inconsistent with the required format. Deregistration was therefore justified and the appeal failed. en-us Fri, 21 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81353 Alterations to a prescribed standard contract were held to violate Clause 33 where they went beyond mutually agreed and countersigned changes and materially altered substantive terms in the appellants' favour. The Court found the reprinted form could mislead contracting parties into treating it as the prescribed standard form, and treated the extensive amendments as inconsistent with the required format. Deregistration was therefore justified and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 21 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81353