<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 160 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81342</link>
    <description>Imported Burmese-origin wood and timber were examined for whether they could simultaneously receive the total customs exemption under Notification No. 280/76-Cus., the concessional basic duty and additional duty exemption under Notification No. 62/85-Cus., and the auxiliary duty exemption under Notification No. 95/85-Cus. The notifications were read together to mean that the exemptions from additional duty and auxiliary duty applied only where the goods were assessed at 10% basic customs duty under Notification No. 62/85-Cus. Goods already enjoying complete exemption under Notification No. 280/76-Cus. could not also claim the further benefits under the other notifications, so the broader simultaneous claim was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:42:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 160 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81342</link>
      <description>Imported Burmese-origin wood and timber were examined for whether they could simultaneously receive the total customs exemption under Notification No. 280/76-Cus., the concessional basic duty and additional duty exemption under Notification No. 62/85-Cus., and the auxiliary duty exemption under Notification No. 95/85-Cus. The notifications were read together to mean that the exemptions from additional duty and auxiliary duty applied only where the goods were assessed at 10% basic customs duty under Notification No. 62/85-Cus. Goods already enjoying complete exemption under Notification No. 280/76-Cus. could not also claim the further benefits under the other notifications, so the broader simultaneous claim was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>