<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 151 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81333</link>
    <description>Where the Central Excise Rules, 1944 prescribed no specific time limit for availing MODVAT credit, delayed taking of credit after receipt of inputs was legally permissible. The objection that such delay would hinder verification was rejected because the inputs remained traceable through gate passes and prescribed records. If the credit could not be correlated with the relevant documents, recovery could still be made under Rule 57-I for wrongly taken credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:24:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 151 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81333</link>
      <description>Where the Central Excise Rules, 1944 prescribed no specific time limit for availing MODVAT credit, delayed taking of credit after receipt of inputs was legally permissible. The objection that such delay would hinder verification was rejected because the inputs remained traceable through gate passes and prescribed records. If the credit could not be correlated with the relevant documents, recovery could still be made under Rule 57-I for wrongly taken credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>