<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 146 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81328</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the imported goods were covered by the REP licenses and did not fall under the restricted category of consumer goods in SKD condition. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order. The Tribunal emphasized interpreting the Import Policy favorably to the importer in case of ambiguities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:09:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 146 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81328</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the imported goods were covered by the REP licenses and did not fall under the restricted category of consumer goods in SKD condition. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order. The Tribunal emphasized interpreting the Import Policy favorably to the importer in case of ambiguities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>