<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 136 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81318</link>
    <description>Ready-to-use pencil erasers packed as stationery were treated as consumer goods under the import policy, so a licence for synthetic rubber products did not cover them; confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962 was upheld. On valuation, the declared assessable value could not be rejected because the Department did not show a clear, objective and lawful basis for re-determination, and the invoice and freight discrepancies were insufficient to dislodge the transaction value; the under-valuation charge was not established. The result was partial relief, with the import-control finding sustained but the valuation enhancement and corresponding penalties reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:32:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 136 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81318</link>
      <description>Ready-to-use pencil erasers packed as stationery were treated as consumer goods under the import policy, so a licence for synthetic rubber products did not cover them; confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962 was upheld. On valuation, the declared assessable value could not be rejected because the Department did not show a clear, objective and lawful basis for re-determination, and the invoice and freight discrepancies were insufficient to dislodge the transaction value; the under-valuation charge was not established. The result was partial relief, with the import-control finding sustained but the valuation enhancement and corresponding penalties reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>