<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 240 - CEGAT, NEW DELHIQ</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81292</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 70-Cus. was held admissible where the importer had applied for the prescribed not manufactured in India certificate before import, and the certificate was issued after clearance. The Tribunal treated the later issuance as sufficient because the goods were otherwise covered by the notification and the conditions were substantively met. A purely technical objection based on the timing of the certificate was not accepted, and the exemption benefit was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:30:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 240 - CEGAT, NEW DELHIQ</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81292</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 70-Cus. was held admissible where the importer had applied for the prescribed not manufactured in India certificate before import, and the certificate was issued after clearance. The Tribunal treated the later issuance as sufficient because the goods were otherwise covered by the notification and the conditions were substantively met. A purely technical objection based on the timing of the certificate was not accepted, and the exemption benefit was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>