<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 269 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81272</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals) decision to classify Sleeve Packing and Hexagonal Packing Ring under Tariff Item 68 and Indurated Asbestos under Tariff Item 22F. The demand for duty was limited to six months before the show cause notice date, as there was no evidence of suppression or misstatement by the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:14:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 269 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81272</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals) decision to classify Sleeve Packing and Hexagonal Packing Ring under Tariff Item 68 and Indurated Asbestos under Tariff Item 22F. The demand for duty was limited to six months before the show cause notice date, as there was no evidence of suppression or misstatement by the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>