<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 264 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81267</link>
    <description>Imported second-hand cars were valued for customs duty by taking the ex-factory price from the World Car Catalogue and then allowing deductions for trade discount and Value Added Tax. The Delhi Custom House practice was accepted as the proper valuation basis, and deduction of VAT was not opposed. The car was therefore to be re-assessed in line with that method, using the catalogue price as adjusted by the recognised deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:03:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 264 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81267</link>
      <description>Imported second-hand cars were valued for customs duty by taking the ex-factory price from the World Car Catalogue and then allowing deductions for trade discount and Value Added Tax. The Delhi Custom House practice was accepted as the proper valuation basis, and deduction of VAT was not opposed. The car was therefore to be re-assessed in line with that method, using the catalogue price as adjusted by the recognised deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>