<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (2) TMI 249 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81226</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal found in favor of the applicants in a case challenging the jurisdictional error in the appointment of the Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi, and the delegation of powers in quantifying the demand. The Tribunal dispensed with the pre-deposit of duty and penalty, prohibited coercive actions, imposed restrictions on asset alienation, and mandated the submission of detailed financial information by a specified deadline for further review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:06:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (2) TMI 249 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81226</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal found in favor of the applicants in a case challenging the jurisdictional error in the appointment of the Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi, and the delegation of powers in quantifying the demand. The Tribunal dispensed with the pre-deposit of duty and penalty, prohibited coercive actions, imposed restrictions on asset alienation, and mandated the submission of detailed financial information by a specified deadline for further review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>