https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81224 Statutory relaxation notifications under Section 16A(1) of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 were upheld because the Court found sufficient material supporting the public-interest policy choice and applied limited judicial review, with parliamentary laying providing additional oversight. The challenge based on alleged absence of material for suspension or relaxation failed. The Court also held that Section 16A did not make consultation with the Export Inspection Council a condition precedent, and refused to imply a requirement not expressed in the statute, noting in any event that consultation had occurred. The petitions were therefore rejected and the notifications sustained. en-us Tue, 29 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:51:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81224 Statutory relaxation notifications under Section 16A(1) of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 were upheld because the Court found sufficient material supporting the public-interest policy choice and applied limited judicial review, with parliamentary laying providing additional oversight. The challenge based on alleged absence of material for suspension or relaxation failed. The Court also held that Section 16A did not make consultation with the Export Inspection Council a condition precedent, and refused to imply a requirement not expressed in the statute, noting in any event that consultation had occurred. The petitions were therefore rejected and the notifications sustained. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 29 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81224