<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (2) TMI 245 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81215</link>
    <description>Limestone powder was found covered by Notification No. 23/55-C.E. dated 29-4-1955 because the Tribunal treated an earlier determination on the same exemption as binding and no longer open to challenge. On that basis, the duty demand raised under Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 could not survive. The appeals were accordingly rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:27:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (2) TMI 245 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81215</link>
      <description>Limestone powder was found covered by Notification No. 23/55-C.E. dated 29-4-1955 because the Tribunal treated an earlier determination on the same exemption as binding and no longer open to challenge. On that basis, the duty demand raised under Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 could not survive. The appeals were accordingly rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>