<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (1) TMI 296 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81211</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the use of an invalid gate pass was a serious administrative lapse but not an attempt to evade duty, resulting in no duty demandable but a penalty warranted. Regarding unaccounted goods, the Tribunal granted the benefit of the doubt to the appellants due to incomplete goods awaiting inspection. The Tribunal found no evidence of duty evasion in alleged clearance without payment. The case of assembling versus manufacturing tape recorders was remanded for re-examination. The confiscation of goods and duty demand were set aside, with the penalty reduced and the tape recorder issue remanded for further review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:19:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (1) TMI 296 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81211</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the use of an invalid gate pass was a serious administrative lapse but not an attempt to evade duty, resulting in no duty demandable but a penalty warranted. Regarding unaccounted goods, the Tribunal granted the benefit of the doubt to the appellants due to incomplete goods awaiting inspection. The Tribunal found no evidence of duty evasion in alleged clearance without payment. The case of assembling versus manufacturing tape recorders was remanded for re-examination. The confiscation of goods and duty demand were set aside, with the penalty reduced and the tape recorder issue remanded for further review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>