https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81206 An administrative authority had no implied power under the governing policy to review and cancel its earlier order, so the cancellation lacked authority. The cancellation was also invalid because it was made without hearing the affected parties, breaching natural justice. Further, once the export obligation had already been fully discharged, including within the extended period granted, the later debarring order had no sustainable basis and could not stand. The impugned orders were quashed and the petitions were allowed with the substantive reliefs sought. en-us Mon, 23 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:59:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81206 An administrative authority had no implied power under the governing policy to review and cancel its earlier order, so the cancellation lacked authority. The cancellation was also invalid because it was made without hearing the affected parties, breaching natural justice. Further, once the export obligation had already been fully discharged, including within the extended period granted, the later debarring order had no sustainable basis and could not stand. The impugned orders were quashed and the petitions were allowed with the substantive reliefs sought. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 23 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81206