https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81204 A prosecution for non-payment of penalty under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 was not premature where the petitioner had merely filed an appeal and no express order had dispensed with the pre-deposit requirement under Rule 6A of the Foreign Exchange Regulation (Adjudication Proceedings and Appeal) Rules, 1974. Filing the appeal within time and obtaining an appeal number did not amount to implied dispensation of deposit. In the absence of a specific waiver by the appellate authority, the obligation to pay within the stipulated period remained enforceable, and criminal proceedings could continue. en-us Tue, 11 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:51:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81204 A prosecution for non-payment of penalty under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 was not premature where the petitioner had merely filed an appeal and no express order had dispensed with the pre-deposit requirement under Rule 6A of the Foreign Exchange Regulation (Adjudication Proceedings and Appeal) Rules, 1974. Filing the appeal within time and obtaining an appeal number did not amount to implied dispensation of deposit. In the absence of a specific waiver by the appellate authority, the obligation to pay within the stipulated period remained enforceable, and criminal proceedings could continue. Case-Laws FEMA Tue, 11 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81204