<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (1) TMI 282 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81192</link>
    <description>The tribunal directed the authorities to calculate the yarn count after allowing for a tolerance limit, emphasizing the need for tolerance in count determination. The tribunal highlighted the importance of following procedural requirements and the responsibility of the appellants to provide valid grounds for adjournment requests. It was ruled that the demand should only apply to the lots found in stock on a particular day and the yarn produced on that day, with evidence required to support demands for subsequent periods. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of allowing for tolerance in count determination for accuracy and fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:26:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (1) TMI 282 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81192</link>
      <description>The tribunal directed the authorities to calculate the yarn count after allowing for a tolerance limit, emphasizing the need for tolerance in count determination. The tribunal highlighted the importance of following procedural requirements and the responsibility of the appellants to provide valid grounds for adjournment requests. It was ruled that the demand should only apply to the lots found in stock on a particular day and the yarn produced on that day, with evidence required to support demands for subsequent periods. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of allowing for tolerance in count determination for accuracy and fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>