<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (8) TMI 285 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81169</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for review and rectification, emphasizing the lack of a mistake apparent on the record and the inapplicability of the Special Bench decision to the present case. The Tribunal upheld its original order regarding the unauthorized import of Alkyl Benzene under suspicious licences, confirming the confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:15:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (8) TMI 285 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81169</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for review and rectification, emphasizing the lack of a mistake apparent on the record and the inapplicability of the Special Bench decision to the present case. The Tribunal upheld its original order regarding the unauthorized import of Alkyl Benzene under suspicious licences, confirming the confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>