<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 291 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81158</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the stay petitions as the appellants failed to comply with the court&#039;s order and lacked bona fides. The respondent&#039;s entitlement to additional licenses for the years 1978-79 and 1979-80 was upheld, with the appellants directed to adhere to the modifications specified by the court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 291 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81158</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the stay petitions as the appellants failed to comply with the court&#039;s order and lacked bona fides. The respondent&#039;s entitlement to additional licenses for the years 1978-79 and 1979-80 was upheld, with the appellants directed to adhere to the modifications specified by the court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>