https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81145 The Tribunal rejected the applications for condonation of delay in all 12 appeals filed by the Collector of Central Excise, Ahmedabad, due to a delay of 48 days beyond the prescribed period. Despite valid reasons for part of the delay, the Tribunal found negligence on the part of the appellants and ruled that there was no sufficient cause for the late filing of the appeals. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as time-barred, emphasizing the importance of demonstrating sufficient cause to condone delays in filing appeals. en-us Tue, 26 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:09:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81145 The Tribunal rejected the applications for condonation of delay in all 12 appeals filed by the Collector of Central Excise, Ahmedabad, due to a delay of 48 days beyond the prescribed period. Despite valid reasons for part of the delay, the Tribunal found negligence on the part of the appellants and ruled that there was no sufficient cause for the late filing of the appeals. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as time-barred, emphasizing the importance of demonstrating sufficient cause to condone delays in filing appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 26 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81145