<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 232 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81132</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order rejecting the refund claim, ruling that the limitation for claiming a refund under Notification 85/85 should be calculated from the date of duty payment, as per Section 11B of the Central Excises &amp;amp; Salt Act, 1944. The decision emphasized aligning refund claims with duty payment dates rather than the end of the financial year for determining eligibility under such notifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:13:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 232 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81132</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order rejecting the refund claim, ruling that the limitation for claiming a refund under Notification 85/85 should be calculated from the date of duty payment, as per Section 11B of the Central Excises &amp;amp; Salt Act, 1944. The decision emphasized aligning refund claims with duty payment dates rather than the end of the financial year for determining eligibility under such notifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>