<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (2) TMI 357 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81131</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the Collector&#039;s order and granting relief to the appellants. It held that the appellants were not the actual importers and were not liable for duty evasion as they had no intention to divert goods for non-specified uses. The demands were deemed time-barred under Section 28 of the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:08:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (2) TMI 357 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81131</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the Collector&#039;s order and granting relief to the appellants. It held that the appellants were not the actual importers and were not liable for duty evasion as they had no intention to divert goods for non-specified uses. The demands were deemed time-barred under Section 28 of the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>