<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 231 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81129</link>
    <description>The expression &quot;Animal Feed&quot; in Item 21 of the Second Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was held to cover not only the basic ration fed to animals but also feed supplements and constituent inputs used for nourishment, growth, production and efficient output. Applying that broad construction, de-oiled rice-bran and soya bean meal exported as animal-nutrition ingredients were classified as animal feed and made liable to export duty. The Tribunal treated later reference to animal feed supplements in the exemption framework as clarificatory and relied on prior High Court reasoning and technical material supporting an inclusive understanding of animal feed. The decision was against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:04:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 231 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81129</link>
      <description>The expression &quot;Animal Feed&quot; in Item 21 of the Second Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was held to cover not only the basic ration fed to animals but also feed supplements and constituent inputs used for nourishment, growth, production and efficient output. Applying that broad construction, de-oiled rice-bran and soya bean meal exported as animal-nutrition ingredients were classified as animal feed and made liable to export duty. The Tribunal treated later reference to animal feed supplements in the exemption framework as clarificatory and relied on prior High Court reasoning and technical material supporting an inclusive understanding of animal feed. The decision was against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>