<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (1) TMI 281 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81117</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants on all issues. The Base Frame and Drive Set were classified under Tariff Item 29A(3) as parts of refrigerating machinery, eligible for exemption under Notification 80/62. The application under Section 35E(2) for recovery of an erroneous refund was deemed procedurally incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:25:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (1) TMI 281 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81117</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants on all issues. The Base Frame and Drive Set were classified under Tariff Item 29A(3) as parts of refrigerating machinery, eligible for exemption under Notification 80/62. The application under Section 35E(2) for recovery of an erroneous refund was deemed procedurally incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>