https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81116 The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order for confiscation and penalty, as the goods were found to be substantially in compliance with import requirements for manufacturing goods for export. The tribunal emphasized the negligible nature of the width discrepancy and lack of justification for confiscation and duty demand. The matter was remanded for de novo adjudication by the competent authority due to the improper decision-making process of the Deputy Collector. en-us Tue, 29 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:24:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81116 The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order for confiscation and penalty, as the goods were found to be substantially in compliance with import requirements for manufacturing goods for export. The tribunal emphasized the negligible nature of the width discrepancy and lack of justification for confiscation and duty demand. The matter was remanded for de novo adjudication by the competent authority due to the improper decision-making process of the Deputy Collector. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 29 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81116