<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 234 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81114</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed challenging the dismissal of a writ petition contesting a show cause notice and subsequent communication. The court upheld the dismissal but set aside the imposed condition of interest payment after dismissal, stating it was unwarranted. The court emphasized that the decision on interest recovery should be left to the Revenue, not imposed post-dismissal. The judgment highlighted the importance of timely duty payment and the procedural aspect of imposing conditions after dismissing a writ petition challenging such notices. The writ appeal was partially allowed without costs, leaving the appellant&#039;s liability determination to the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 234 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81114</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed challenging the dismissal of a writ petition contesting a show cause notice and subsequent communication. The court upheld the dismissal but set aside the imposed condition of interest payment after dismissal, stating it was unwarranted. The court emphasized that the decision on interest recovery should be left to the Revenue, not imposed post-dismissal. The judgment highlighted the importance of timely duty payment and the procedural aspect of imposing conditions after dismissing a writ petition challenging such notices. The writ appeal was partially allowed without costs, leaving the appellant&#039;s liability determination to the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>