<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (1) TMI 276 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81111</link>
    <description>Rectification is confined to an obvious and self-evident error on the face of the record, and cannot be used to reargue factual findings or seek review of the Tribunal&#039;s earlier decision. The objections raised required reconsideration of evidence and prior conclusions, so no apparent mistake was shown and rectification failed. A reference lies only where a genuine question of law arises from the decision; here, the grounds concerned factual controversies about RG-1 entry, documentary evidence, quality-control stickers, delayed records, and alleged suppression, all already addressed below. No referable question of law survived, so the reference application was not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:12:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (1) TMI 276 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81111</link>
      <description>Rectification is confined to an obvious and self-evident error on the face of the record, and cannot be used to reargue factual findings or seek review of the Tribunal&#039;s earlier decision. The objections raised required reconsideration of evidence and prior conclusions, so no apparent mistake was shown and rectification failed. A reference lies only where a genuine question of law arises from the decision; here, the grounds concerned factual controversies about RG-1 entry, documentary evidence, quality-control stickers, delayed records, and alleged suppression, all already addressed below. No referable question of law survived, so the reference application was not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>