<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81108</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the inclusion of cylinder costs in the assessable value of oxygen and dissolved acetylene gas. The appellants successfully argued that the cost of durable and returnable cylinders should not be part of the assessable value, citing legal precedents and relevant provisions. The Tribunal agreed, emphasizing that such costs cannot be included. Additionally, the limitation defense against a show cause notice demanding duty for a specific period was upheld, as the appellants demonstrated no suppression or misstatement, leading to relief for the appellants on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:08:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81108</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the inclusion of cylinder costs in the assessable value of oxygen and dissolved acetylene gas. The appellants successfully argued that the cost of durable and returnable cylinders should not be part of the assessable value, citing legal precedents and relevant provisions. The Tribunal agreed, emphasizing that such costs cannot be included. Additionally, the limitation defense against a show cause notice demanding duty for a specific period was upheld, as the appellants demonstrated no suppression or misstatement, leading to relief for the appellants on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>