https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81099 The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal as the Madhya Pradesh High Court's order only addressed transport charges and not classification or rate of duty issues. The Tribunal upheld the reduction in the refund amount and rejected claims of calculation errors or miscarriage of justice. The appellants' request for admission of additional grounds was partially granted, with one ground allowed while others were rejected as repetitive or unrelated to the original appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to legal provisions, including the limitation period for filing refund claims. en-us Mon, 16 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:44:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81099 The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal as the Madhya Pradesh High Court's order only addressed transport charges and not classification or rate of duty issues. The Tribunal upheld the reduction in the refund amount and rejected claims of calculation errors or miscarriage of justice. The appellants' request for admission of additional grounds was partially granted, with one ground allowed while others were rejected as repetitive or unrelated to the original appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to legal provisions, including the limitation period for filing refund claims. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 16 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81099